Important: These pages summarise the department's own Self Appraisal Report (SAR) submitted to NBA. Nothing here is a score awarded by NBA. The peer team site visit and official assessment are yet to be conducted.
The full SAR runs to 481 pages. These pages follow its table of contents exactly — nine criteria, 85 sub-criteria and 101 lettered sub-points — and summarise each one in a few paragraphs with its key table and the evidence behind it. Every page links into the PDF at the right page for the full text.
NBA assesses a diploma programme against nine criteria worth 1000 marks in total. Each criterion breaks into numbered sub-criteria, and most sub-criteria into lettered sub-points (A, B, C) that carry their own marks. The numbering, titles and marks used throughout these pages are taken verbatim from the official NBA scheme, so they match the SAR and the evaluator's worksheet item for item.
These are summaries, not the report. Where a sub-point turns on a table of figures, that table is reproduced; where it turns on documentary evidence, the evidence is named. For the full text, follow the PDF link on any heading.
From Part A of the SAR, which records institute and programme particulars before the criteria begin.
Marks shown are the official NBA maxima, not scores.
Vision, Mission and PEOs — how they were defined, published, and shown to be known.
The GTU curriculum, the gaps found in it, and everything the department does to teach around them.
Course and programme outcome attainment, computed as 80% direct assessment plus 20% indirect.
Enrolment, pass rates, academic performance and placement — the formula-driven criterion.
Faculty numbers, qualifications, retention, training and appraisal.
Classrooms, nine laboratories, computing, and the purchase record behind them.
What the department did with its own measurements, and how the target rises each year.
Mentoring, feedback, careers and the SSIP entrepreneurship cell.
Governance, budget, library and internet — mostly inherited from the state framework.
Every sub-criterion in the SAR, in order. Follow any line to its summary.
Every number on these pages is taken from the SAR itself. Where the SAR does not state a figure, none is given here. Attainment figures come from the CO and PO attainment tables in Criterion 3 and the target and attainment tables in Criterion 7; enrolment, pass-rate and placement figures from Criterion 4; faculty figures from Criterion 5; and purchase and budget figures from Criteria 6 and 9.
The criterion numbering, heading text and marks follow the official NBA diploma SAR scheme and the programme evaluator's worksheet exactly.
The National Board of Accreditation evaluates technical programmes against defined quality standards. Diploma-level (Tier 2) accreditation assesses the nine criteria summarised here. The Self Appraisal Report is the department's own documented self-assessment, submitted before the NBA peer team's site visit; the final decision and official scores are determined by that team after the visit.
